WEBSITE HELP · FROM $200
Focused technical review for one defined website, search, analytics, accessibility, provider, migration, or systems question.
The fit
Use a focused review when a proposal, persistent failure, measurement conflict, migration, accessibility concern, or technical claim needs an evidence-backed second opinion.
The starting price applies to one bounded issue or diagnosis. Larger recovery, migration, investigation, or implementation work receives a written quote after review.
The initial review
Source-labeled measurement
Search Console, GA4, self-hosted Umami, and durable form records each observe a different part of the customer path. Their numbers should not be silently blended.
Boho-built evidence systemFree + open source
Boho Analytics Platform + Site Graph
Want to handle the measurement side of organic SEO yourself? Self-host the public Boho Analytics release, or inspect how it keeps different evidence sources separate before recommendations are made.
Search clicks are not sessions. Edge requests are not visitors.
One operational viewCommand centerExplore the command center ↗Synthetic demo · no client data
Compare without blendingPlot builderExplore Plot Builder ↗Synthetic demo site · structural evidence
Structure, not visitor behaviorSite GraphExplore Site Graph ↗Free means a $0 software license. It does not mean free hosting, provider accounts, SEO labor, support, maintenance, or custom integrations. Open the blank-configuration quick start ↗ (opens in a new tab)
Research evidence
The current Boho Analytics Platform, its Plot Builder, research practice, and analysis work show how sources and decisions can remain connected. Screenshots use clearly labeled synthetic demo data.
A controlled delivery path
Identify what customers or operators need to do and what problem is preventing it.
Review the website, search presence, content, accounts, data, providers, and technical dependencies relevant to that job.
Repair, integrate, redesign, or build only what the evidence and scope justify.
Test the agreed result, record what changed, explain known limitations, and preserve an understandable handoff.
A usable handoff
State the defined question, the short answer supported by the review, and the decision it affects.
Identify what was reviewed, which sources were available, and when collection or inspection succeeded.
Limit the main recommendations to the few actions justified by the evidence.
Disclose missing access, weak evidence, uncertainty, and what should not be purchased or changed yet.
Before the proposal
The system, review period, available sources, decision, and expected output can be named before the work begins.
No. A responsible audit identifies evidence, limitations, priorities, and verification steps. It cannot control search engines, customers, competitors, providers, or other third parties.
It applies to one bounded issue or diagnosis. If the review supports additional repair, migration, or implementation, that work is scoped separately in writing.
